ON FAIRNESS AND WELFARE ANALYSIS UNDER UNCERTAINTY by
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper investigates the role of fairness, uncertainty, and a "veil of ignorance" in efficient resource allocation. It focuses on the choice of private and public goods, the method of financing, as well as the choice of information available for public decision-making. A fair-equivalent and Pareto efficient allocation is presented using a maximin criterion defined in terms of individual willingness-to-pay. The paper investigates the role of information in public decision making in terms of its implications for both efficiency and fairness. While better information typically generates improved efficiency, it can also contribute to unfair allocations. The effects of asymmetric information are discussed.
منابع مشابه
Fairness versus Welfare: Notes on the Pareto Principle, Preferences, and Distributive Justice
In Fairness versus Welfare, we advance the thesis that social policies should be assessed entirely on the basis of their effects on individuals’ well-being. This thesis implies that no independent weight should be accorded to notions of fairness (other than many purely distributive notions). We support our thesis in three ways: by demonstrating how notions of fairness perversely reduce welfare,...
متن کاملHow Good are Optimal Cake Divisions?
We consider the problem of selecting fair divisions of a heterogeneous divisible good among a set of agents. Recent work (Cohler et al., AAAI 2011) focused on designing algorithms for computing optimal—social welfare maximizing (maxsum)—allocations under the fairness notion of envyfreeness. Maxsum allocations can also be found under alternative notions such as equitability. In this paper, we as...
متن کاملRisk, Inequality, Insurance, and Welfare
This paper weighs in on the ongoing debate over the appropriate balance between efficiency and equity. I explore the relationship between our attitudes about risk and our beliefs about distributive justice. The notion that there is a deep relationship between risk and inequality is not a new one; discussions of the topic date at least from Harsanyi’s work on the subject in the 1950s. Harsanyi a...
متن کاملOn Maxsum Fair Cake Divisions
We consider the problem of selecting fair divisions of a heterogeneous divisible good among a set of agents. Recent work (Cohler et al., AAAI 2011) focused on designing algorithms for computing maxsum—social welfare maximizing—allocations under the fairness notion of envyfreeness. Maxsum allocations can also be found under alternative notions such as equitability. In this paper, we examine the ...
متن کاملA Beyond Dominant Resource Fairness: Extensions, Limitations, and Indivisibilities
We study the problem of allocating multiple resources to agents with heterogeneous demands. Technological advances such as cloud computing and data centers provide a new impetus for investigating this problem under the assumption that agents demand the resources in fixed proportions, known in economics as Leontief preferences. In a recent paper, Ghodsi et al. [2011] introduced the dominant reso...
متن کامل